IBF stand rubbish, says TRAI Chairman, RS Sharma

TRAI chairman RS Sharma has rubbished IBF’s (Indian broadcasting foundation) claims that amendments in the NTO 1.0 and NTO 2 .0 will severely impact broadcasters interests viability of pay TV industry.

Sharma has said that TRAI has taken the right steps in the interests of the audience and industry and no one should be compelled to watch channels they don’t want to see. “Our own data points that 90% of the people watch only about 50 channels out of the 800-900 channels in the country’’ said Sharma as he added that as compared to television, OTT platform allows much more freedom to watch content and one of the reasons for audience shifting away to OTT platforms.

“So it cannot be attributed to provisions of the NTO 2.0 or NTO1.0 which is not against the interests of the industry or unreasonable. TRAI’s has taken right steps in the interests of the audience and industry. No one should be compelled to watch channels they don’t want to see” said Sharma in a live conversation with Kailashnath Adhikari, MD, Governance Now during the Visionary Talk Series held by the public policy and governance analysis platform.

The TRAI chairman was responding to a question on IBF’S statement where it has raised concerns that amendments in the NTO 1.0 and NTO 2 .0 will severely impact ability of broad casters to compete with other unregulated platforms and adversely impact viability of pay TV industry. It also says that many channels have had to close down resulting in job losses.

Refraining from commenting further as the matter is subjudice in court, the regulatory authority chairman however said, “IBF’s statement is rubbish and only to bring fear in the minds of people.”

See Also

IBF Expresses Disappointment on the Amended Tariff Order and Interconnection Regulations issued by TRAI

“What right do you have? You have approached the court. There is a rule of law and regulation. The H’ble court will decide on the issue. Are you fighting the battle of legality or of perception of public? This is not fair. There is a law which can be challenged on an appropriate fora and that challenge has been done. We should wait for the decision of the H’ble court and accordingly go about it. Creating baseless, unmindful fears in the minds of people does not serve any purpose” Sharma said.

Disclaimer: information mentioned here has not been verified or endorsed by Agency Reporter and is in accordance with the press release shared by the company or their appointed representatives.